I read a long article in the latest New York Times magazine about marriage: Married (Happily) with Issues. The author, Elizabeth Weil, decides to take on the project of working on her marriage, even though she says things are pretty good. Having spent many years working on my marriage and talking with friends working on their marriages, I couldn’t resist reading. It’s ten pages long and on each page I thought, “I’ll stop now…I know all this stuff,” but I kept right on reading.
I’m fascinated by how couples and humans in general interact, and I liked where the author was going. My husband (who will surely object to what I am about to say) lives in a world of the dream, the vision of how it could be, the beauty, the perfection, the harmony. I am more pragmatic (and realistic, I think!) and believe we’ll have our good moments and our bad moments, and they will happen all by themselves. That is not to say that I don’t think working on a marriage is a good thing. We have done a lot of it and it has definitely made both of us happier, together and as individuals. But when is enough enough?
Here is a link to the article.
In case you are not up for a 10-page read, here are some of the things that really stuck out for me. Near the beginning of the article, Weil gives a little background on her relationship.
Dan and I married on July 1, 2000, in Olema, Calif. I wore a white dress. Dan was 32; I was 30. We vowed to have and to hold, to love and to cherish in sickness and in health, etc. We were optimistic, cocky and vague about the concept of marriage. We never discussed, or considered discussing, why we were getting married or what a good marriage would mean. It all seemed obvious. I loved Dan; I loved how I felt with him. Ergo I wanted to be his wife.
Oh my god! This is like a tailor-made reason why I want to work with couples that are getting married! I have been asking myself lately if maybe I had been wrong, maybe couples today do talk everything through ahead of time. But I realized, no, my instincts, and experience talking with people is right: we tend to ignore what we don’t need to deal with right now. Better to put stuff on the table up front and work from there, than waiting to go into therapy down the line. In my mind, being open to the fact that there will be sticky moments, annoyances, and sore subjects will only strengthen any partnership. Living with the illusion of perfection and harmony puts too much pressure on everyone.
The author then poses what I think is a crucial set of questions.
What would a better marriage look like? More happiness? Intimacy? Stability? Laughter? Fewer fights? A smoother partnership? More intriguing conversation? More excellent sex? Our goal and how to reach it were strangely unclear.
I think we as human beings hold on to some sort of ideal, but if we really break it down, it’s not at all clear what we’re really looking for. And, will we know when we’re there?
This bit from the end of the article really resonated with me and also made me feel somehow relieved.
In psychiatry, the term “good-enough mother” describes the parent who loves her child well enough for him to grow into an emotionally healthy adult. The goal is mental health, defined as the fortitude and flexibility to live one’s own life — not happiness. This is a crucial distinction. Similarly the “good-enough marriage” is characterized by its capacity to allow spouses to keep growing, to afford them the strength and bravery required to face the world.
This was not going to be one of those articles that tells me I’m doing it all wrong! Or telling me there is one way to do it. It feels real. My husband and I love each other. We also drive each other crazy. We have good moments and we have bad moments. But there has always been room to grow in our relationship, and that’s what keeps us together.